Attempt to address #11705 and #11028.
The docker container runs gitea by default: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/1d1215108681790f3333a19cf2b03a03b5df48ae/docker/root/etc/s6/gitea/run
Whereas a user might run `forgejo doctor ...` (which is symlinked to gitea).
So the doctor expects a different value for the authorized_keys command.
This fix does the opposite of syncAppConfForGit: it fetches the `AppPath` from the database to ensure it is the same as forgejo:
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/1d1215108681790f3333a19cf2b03a03b5df48ae/routers/init.go#L76-L87
### Testing
1. Make a symlink called `forgejo`, pointing to gitea `ln -s gitea forgejo`
2. Run `./gitea` and add a ssh key to a user
3. Stop `./gitea`
4. Run `./forgejo doctor check --run authorized-keys`
Without this fix, the last command should fail.
With the fix, the last command should succeed and print:
```
- [I] AppPath changed from '/home/forgejo/forgejo' to '/home/forgejo/gitea'
```
- I ran...
- [x] `make pr-go` before pushing
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change.
- [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change.
*The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.*
The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12901
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Fixes#2325.
This introduces a way to download downsized versions of the user and repository avatars:
* `/avatars/123abcd` still serves the full-size avatar
* `/avatars/123abcd?size=64` serves it at size 64x64 px
Those downsized versions are computed on demand when requested for the first time and cached. The caching is done in a storage location configurable in the instance settings, just like the storage locations for the full-sized avatars are. The sizes of the downsized images are restricted to a fixed set of sizes, so that the cache doesn't grow too big. The caching and resizing logic is exposed in a way that could potentially be reused for other types of images (such as user uploads in issue discussions).
Luckily, the Go templates already specify in many places which size those avatars should be rendered, even if this information was only used for external avatar providers (such as Gravatar) until now.
The range of sizes requested by the HTML templates is rather wide: the table below lists all the sizes I could find, and the corresponding size served by the backend with the logic I implemented. The scaling factor of 2 was already used for requesting resized external avatars, and likely exists to make sure that users with display scaling enabled get a sharper picture.
| Size requested in the template | After scaling (x2) | Size of the image served |
|---------|---------|---------|
| 256 px | 512 px | original (512 px) |
| 140 px | 280 px | original (512 px) |
| 48 px | 96 px | 128 px |
| 40 px | 80 px | 128 px |
| 32 px | 64 px | 64 px |
| 28 px | 56 px | 64 px |
| 24 px | 48 px | 64 px |
| 20 px | 40 px | 64 px |
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11242
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
In the case you hit some API error (Github ratelimit was often a problem) or the instance restarted in the middle of your migration, you would be left with data on the disk and/or database. Upon retrying the migration the migration code would (rightfully) fail because it's trying to migrate stuff that already exists.
This was hit so often on Codeberg it was better to force people to delete and start whole migration process again: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo/commit/28ee60c91f237268aa526086d0cce7a8f5380a9b
Delete the repository data before retrying to solve this.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12370
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
This PR is replacing repository based hooks hooks with centralised files, this way the files don't need to be copied into every repository, only one line of config need to be added in the repository.
Closes: #3523
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10397
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
A security vulnerability that was fixed in #9840 had the potential to corrupt the `authorized_keys` file that Forgejo is managing to allow ssh access. In the event that it was corrupted, the existing behaviour of Forgejo is to maintain the contents that it finds in the `authorized_keys` file, potentially making an exploit of a Forgejo server persistent despite attempts to rewrite the key file.
This feature adds a new layer of security resiliency in order to prevent persistent ssh key corruption. When Forgejo starts up, if relevant, Forgejo will read the `authorized_keys` file and validate the file's contents. If any keys are found in the file that are not expected, then Forgejo will terminate its startup in order to signal to the server administrator that a critical security risk is present that must be addressed:
```
2025/11/07 10:13:50 modules/ssh/init.go:86:Init() [F] An unexpected ssh public key was discovered. Forgejo will shutdown to require this to be fixed. Fix by either:
Option 1: Delete the file /home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys, and Forgejo will recreate it with only expected ssh public keys.
Option 2: Permit unexpected keys by setting [server].SSH_ALLOW_UNEXPECTED_AUTHORIZED_KEYS=true in Forgejo's config file.
Unexpected key on line 1 of /home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys
Unexpected key on line 2 of /home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys
Unexpected key on line 3 of /home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys
Unexpected key on line 4 of /home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys
Unexpected key on line 5 of /home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys
```
As noted in the log message, the server administrator can address this problem in one of two ways:
- If they delete the file that contains the unexpected keys, Forgejo will regenerate it containing only the expected keys from the Forgejo database.
- If they would like to run their server with ssh keys that are not managed by Forgejo (for example, if they're reusing a `git` ssh user that is accessed through `git@server` and does not invoke Forgejo's ssh handlers), then they can disable the new security check by setting `[server].SSH_ALLOW_UNEXPECTED_AUTHORIZED_KEYS = true` in their `app.ini`.
**This is a breaking change**: the default behaviour is to be restrictive in the contents of `authorized_keys` in order to ensure that server administrators with unexpected keys in `authorized_keys` are aware of those keys.
If `SSH_ALLOW_UNEXPECTED_AUTHORIZED_KEYS=false`, then the behaviour when Forgejo rewrites the `authorized_keys` file is changed to not maintain any unexpected keys in the file. If the value is `true`, then the old behaviour is retained.
The `doctor check` subcommand is updated to use the new validity routines:
```
[4] Check if OpenSSH authorized_keys file is up-to-date
- [E] Unexpected key on line 1 of /home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys
- [E] Key in database is not present in /home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys: ...
- [E] authorized_keys file "/home/forgejo/.ssh/authorized_keys" contains validity errors.
Regenerate it with:
"forgejo admin regenerate keys"
or
"forgejo doctor check --run authorized-keys --fix"
ERROR
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [x] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- **Documentation updates required**; pending initial reviews of this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10010
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: mfenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: mfenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Adds four foreign keys:
- stopwatch -- issue_id -> issue, user_id -> user
- tracked_time -- issue_id -> issue, user_id -> user
The majority of work encompassed in this PR is updating testing and support infrastructure to support foreign keys:
- `models/db/foreign_keys.go` adds new capabilities to sort registered tables into the right insertion order to avoid violating foreign keys
- `RecreateTables`, used by migration testing and the `doctor recreate-table` CLI, has been updated to support tables with foreign keys; new restrictions require that FK-related tables be rebuilt at the same time
- test fixture data is inserted in foreign-key order, and deleted in the reverse
An upgrade to xorm v1.3.9-forgejo.2 is incorporated in this PR, as two unexpected behaviors in the foreign key schema management were discovered during development of the updated `RecreateTables` routine.
Work in this PR is laid out to be reviewed easier commit-by-commit.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9373
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
- The doctor commands to check the validity of existing usernames and
email addresses depend on functionality that have configurable behavior
depending on the values of the `[service]` settings, so load them when
running the doctor command.
- Resolves#6664
- No unit test due to the architecture of doctor commands.
# Testing
1. Set `[service].ALLOW_DOTS_IN_USERNAMES = true`.
2. Create a user that contains a dot in their username.
3. Run the `check-user-name` doctor command and verify there's no error reported.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6674
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
If a row in the two_factor table references a non existent user, it may contain a secret that has an invalid format. Such an orphaned row is never used and should be removed.
Improve the error message to suggest using the doctor to remove it.
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6637
## Testing
- make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' watch
- make TAGS='sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify' forgejo
- sqlite3 data/gitea.db 'INSERT INTO two_factor VALUES( 0, 500, "", "", "", "", 0, 0)'
- ./forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency
```
[1] Check consistency of database
- [W] Found 1 Orphaned TwoFactor without existing User
OK
All done (checks: 1).
```
- ./forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency --fix
```
[1] Check consistency of database
- [I] Deleted 1 Orphaned TwoFactor without existing User
OK
All done (checks: 1).
```
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6639): <!--number 6639 --><!--line 0 --><!--description VGVhY2ggdGhlIGRvY3RvciB0byByZW1vdmUgb3JwaGFuZWQgdHdvX2ZhY3RvciB3aXRoIGBmb3JnZWpvIGRvY3RvciBjaGVjayAtLXJ1biBjaGVjay1kYi1jb25zaXN0ZW5jeSAtLWZpeGAuIFN1Y2ggcm93cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBpbnZhbGlkIGRhdGEgYW5kIFtibG9jayB0aGUgbWlncmF0aW9uIHRvIHYxMF0oaHR0cHM6Ly9jb2RlYmVyZy5vcmcvZm9yZ2Vqby9mb3JnZWpvL2lzc3Vlcy82NjM3KSB3aXRoIGEgbWVzc2FnZSBzdWNoIGFzIGBmYWlsZWQ6IEFlc0RlY3J5cHQgaW52YWxpZCBkZWNyeXB0ZWQgYmFzZTY0IHN0cmluZzogaWxsZWdhbCBiYXNlNjQgZGF0YSBhdCBpbnB1dCBieXRlIDBgLg==-->Teach the doctor to remove orphaned two_factor with `forgejo doctor check --run check-db-consistency --fix`. Such rows may contain invalid data and [block the migration to v10](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6637) with a message such as `failed: AesDecrypt invalid decrypted base64 string: illegal base64 data at input byte 0`.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6639
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
On postgres the new check for orphaned authorization tokens fails with:
- [E] Error: pq: syntax error at or near "." whilst counting Authorization token without existing User
Adding marks to the user table reference allows the check to succeed
Resolve#32232
Users can disable the "Actions" unit for all mirror repos by running
```
gitea doctor check --run disable-mirror-actions-unit --fix
```
(cherry picked from commit a910abbb451ea89b8279b43bd818a140fe0f3b51)
- Add a `purpose` column, this allows the `forgejo_auth_token` table to
be used by other parts of Forgejo, while still enjoying the
no-compromise architecture.
- Remove the 'roll your own crypto' time limited code functions and
migrate them to the `forgejo_auth_token` table. This migration ensures
generated codes can only be used for their purpose and ensure they are
invalidated after their usage by deleting it from the database, this
also should help making auditing of the security code easier, as we're
no longer trying to stuff a lot of data into a HMAC construction.
-Helper functions are rewritten to ensure a safe-by-design approach to
these tokens.
- Add the `forgejo_auth_token` to dbconsistency doctor and add it to the
`deleteUser` function.
- TODO: Add cron job to delete expired authorization tokens.
- Unit and integration tests added.
Introduce "idNumber" for each migration, and clarify the difference
between the migration ID number and database version.
---
Conflict resolution: trivial
(cherry picked from commit d70af38447a759d4a935e315e18efa4dd625f655)
- On editting a team, only update the units if the team isn't the
'Owners' team. Otherwise the 'Owners' team end up having all of their
unit access modes set to 'None'; because the request form doesn't send
over any units, as it's simply not shown in the UI.
- Adds a database inconstency check and fix for the case where the
'Owners' team is affected by this bug.
- Adds unit test.
- Adds integration test.
- Resolves#5528
- Regression of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24012
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .
I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.
```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
@echo " - lint-spell lint spelling"
@echo " - lint-spell-fix lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Resolve all cases for `unused parameter` and `unnecessary type
arguments`
Related: #30729
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit e80466f7349164ce4cf3c07bdac30d736d20f035)
Conflicts:
modules/markup/markdown/transform_codespan.go
modules/setting/incoming_email.go
routers/api/v1/admin/user_badge.go
routers/private/hook_pre_receive.go
tests/integration/repo_search_test.go
resolved by discarding the change, this is linting only and
for the sake of avoiding future conflicts
Noteable additions:
- `redefines-builtin-id` forbid variable names that shadow go builtins
- `empty-lines` remove unnecessary empty lines that `gofumpt` does not
remove for some reason
- `superfluous-else` eliminate more superfluous `else` branches
Rules are also sorted alphabetically and I cleaned up various parts of
`.golangci.yml`.
(cherry picked from commit 74f0c84fa4245a20ce6fb87dac1faf2aeeded2a2)
Conflicts:
.golangci.yml
apply the linter recommendations to Forgejo code as well
- When the database consistency is being run it would check for any
OAuth2 applications that don't have an existing user. However there are
few special OAuth2 applications that don't have an user set, because
they are global applications.
- This was not taken into account by the database consistency checker
and were removed if the database consistency check was being run with
autofix enabled.
- Take into account to ignore these global OAuth2 applications when
running the database consistency check.
- Add unit tests.
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/1530
- Remove options that currently aren't set
on `GarbageCollectLFSMetaObjectsOptions` and
`IterateLFSMetaObjectsForRepoOptions`.
- Simplify `IterateRepositoryIDsWithLFSMetaObjects` and
`IterateLFSMetaObjectsForRepo`.
- `IterateLFSMetaObjectsForRepo` was previously able to get in a
loop (`gc-lfs` doctor check was able to reproduce this) because the code
expected that the records would be updated to not match the SQL query,
but that wasn't the case. Simply enforce that only records higher than
the latest `id` from the previous iteration are allowed.
- For `gc-lfs` doctor check this was because `UpdatedLessRecentlyThan`
option was not set, which caused that records just marked as active in
the iteration weren't being filtered.
- Add unit tests
- Most likely a regression from 2cc3a6381c.
- The bug with `gc-lfs` was found on Codeberg.
This adds a new `doctor` check: `fix-push-mirrors-without-git-remote`. The new check looks for push mirrors that do not have their remotes configured in git. If automatic fixing is enabled, it will remove these push mirrors from the database.
The check is not run by default, and thus, must be invoked manually. It should be usable in a half-migrated state, too, and as such, fixes#1800.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1853
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Co-committed-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 9038e07ef35978336612588d68c1315179a45c73)
(cherry picked from commit b15bafcbc7d9033b0cc7b0fd888915b117e08d42)
(cherry picked from commit 93ba05a2dd9fdec46f337542cd5f22c8960ac55f)
(cherry picked from commit e418ea80822361e387b460c583592bbd83d4a39e)
(cherry picked from commit 321790a91ec8553d1b3668f606ebec762865dd17)
(cherry picked from commit f4e19d332392cb455b3b4e32e271f3e42302bbc8)
(cherry picked from commit 4d9923dee851a4046050761d3dd352f2f343f4fc)
(cherry picked from commit 049df69eda1ceb47f6e74c9a67e9ce5041e65c3b)
Conflicts:
services/doctor/push_mirror_consistency.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2214
(cherry picked from commit c79cba8d556320be0da7ca8324b39cd8930465bf)
(cherry picked from commit f3a3969c02cade7261a5f25c9e342800ccdf9111)
## Purpose
This is a refactor toward building an abstraction over managing git
repositories.
Afterwards, it does not matter anymore if they are stored on the local
disk or somewhere remote.
## What this PR changes
We used `git.OpenRepository` everywhere previously.
Now, we should split them into two distinct functions:
Firstly, there are temporary repositories which do not change:
```go
git.OpenRepository(ctx, diskPath)
```
Gitea managed repositories having a record in the database in the
`repository` table are moved into the new package `gitrepo`:
```go
gitrepo.OpenRepository(ctx, repo_model.Repo)
```
Why is `repo_model.Repository` the second parameter instead of file
path?
Because then we can easily adapt our repository storage strategy.
The repositories can be stored locally, however, they could just as well
be stored on a remote server.
## Further changes in other PRs
- A Git Command wrapper on package `gitrepo` could be created. i.e.
`NewCommand(ctx, repo_model.Repository, commands...)`. `git.RunOpts{Dir:
repo.RepoPath()}`, the directory should be empty before invoking this
method and it can be filled in the function only. #28940
- Remove the `RepoPath()`/`WikiPath()` functions to reduce the
possibility of mistakes.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
