a81fc2a29048dad1930bd0e6a70ded82724772b0
2117
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Manuel GanterandMathieu Fenniak
|
5b6bbabd74 |
feat: implement ephemeral runners (#9962)
As described in [this comment](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/19#issuecomment-739221) one-job runners are not secure when running in host mode. We implemented a routine preventing runner tokens from receiving a second job in order to render a potentially compromised token useless. Also we implemented a routine that removes finished runners as soon as possible. Big thanks to [ChristopherHX](https://github.com/ChristopherHX) who did all the work for gitea! Rel: #9407 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9962 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Manuel Ganter <manuel.ganter@think-ahead.tech> Co-committed-by: Manuel Ganter <manuel.ganter@think-ahead.tech> |
||
|
Baptiste DaroussinandGusted
|
9762f9ea20 |
fix: portable error reporting for PAM (#11296)
Linux PAM reports "Authentication Failure" OpenPAM reports "authentication error" This resulted in forgejo reporting error 500 on FreeBSD when pam authentication failed. Add a sentinel error to make this portable: ErrInvalidCredentials Signed-off-by: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11296 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Co-committed-by: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> |
||
|
Roberto VidalandGusted
|
ef7acda8be |
fix: return bad request on malformed packages upload input (#10954)
I noticed that the wrong content type in an `/upload` request can trigger a 500, and I'm guessing it is more appropriate to return 400 instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10954 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Roberto Vidal <roberto.vidal@ikumene.com> Co-committed-by: Roberto Vidal <roberto.vidal@ikumene.com> |
||
|
wandhydrantandMathieu Fenniak
|
9ea9582c9b |
fix: cleanup of multi-platform container images (#11246)
This change fixes an issue that makes Forgejo clean up too many versions of a container package even though it should keep them according to the rules set for the package. The issue affects multi-platform container images. Forgejo adds a package version for each platform (for example `linux/amd64`, `linux/arm64`) in addition to the actual tag (for example `0.6.0` or `latest`). This results in rows in the table `package_version` similar to this (unimportant columns omitted for brevity): | **lower_version** | **created_unix** | |---|---| | `latest` | `1768742887`| | `0.6.0` | `1768742886` | | `sha256:038e...` | `1768742886` | | `sha256:fc38...` | `1768742886` | | `0.5.0` | `1768742864` | | `sha256:806d...` | `1768742864` | | `sha256:0a19...` | `1768742864` | | `0.4.0` | `1768742848` | | `...` | `...` | The code assumes that the first `<keep count>` entries can be ignored and considers every entry after `<keep count>` as eligible for cleanup. That doesn't work for multi-platform container images because, for `<keep count>=5`, it considers version `0.4.0` as eligible. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Bug fixes - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11246): <!--number 11246 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Y2xlYW51cCBvZiBtdWx0aS1wbGF0Zm9ybSBjb250YWluZXIgaW1hZ2Vz-->cleanup of multi-platform container images<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11246 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: wandhydrant <wandhydrant@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: wandhydrant <wandhydrant@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
|
|
7791984040 |
fix: correct Reviewed-on URL in merge message for subpath deployments (#11240)
Fixes: #11238 ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Co-authored-by: Diego Díez <diegodiez.ddr@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11240 Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de> Co-committed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
51d0188533 |
refactor: replace Value() from Option[T] with Get() & ValueOrZeroValue() (#11218)
`Option[T]` currently exposes a method `Value()` which is permitted to be called on an option that has a value, and an option that doesn't have a value. This API is awkward because the behaviour if the option doesn't have a value isn't clear to the caller, and, because almost all accesses end up being `.Has()?` then `OK, use .Value()`. `Get() (bool, T)` is added as a better replacement, which both returns whether the option has a value, and the value if present. Most call-sites are rewritten to this form. `ValueOrZeroValue()` is a direct replacement that has the same behaviour that `Value()` had, but describes the behaviour if the value is missing. In addition to the current API being awkward, the core reason for this change is that `Value()` conflicts with the `Value()` function from the `driver.Valuer` interface. If this interface was implemented, it would allow `Option[T]` to be used to represent a nullable field in an xorm bean struct (requires: https://code.forgejo.org/xorm/xorm/pulls/66). _Note:_ changes are extensive in this PR, but are almost all changes are easy, mechanical transitions from `.Has()` to `.Get()`. All of this work was performed by hand. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11218 Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Andreas AhlenstorfandGusted
|
f7873ba393 |
fix: normalize secrets consistently, display accurate help (#11052)
Forgejo's UI claims that whitespace is removed from the beginning and the end of the values of Forgejo Actions variables and secrets. However, that is not correct. The entered values are stored as-is. Only CRLF is replaced with LF, which is also the desired behaviour. This PR changes the incorrect text which is also no longer displayed as placeholder but as a proper help text below the input fields. Furthermore, tests were added to verify the behaviour. While adding tests, I discovered and fixed another inconsistency. Depending on whether secrets were managed using the UI or the HTTP API, they were treated differently. CRLF in secrets entered in the UI was correctly replaced with LF while secrets created using the HTTP API kept CRLF. Fixes #11003. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11052 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch> Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
f24a97f719 |
fix: newly expanded dynamic matrix jobs can become stuck in a 'blocked' state (#11184)
The end-to-end tests are currently failing on v15: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/actions/runs/4900/jobs/8/attempt/1#jobstep-4-356 This is a regression from #11164. The cause of this regression is: - When the job emitter emits new jobs, it *now* sets their `Needs` field correctly, fixed in #11164. - If a job has `needs` set to a non-empty array, it will start as status **blocked**: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/db037fca507178feb2bd05e0bf59df7c7534116d/models/actions/run.go#L369-L370 This got past manual testing and the end-to-end test run in #11164 because it is intermittent. If the runner invokes `UpdateTask` multiple times once the status of the job is settled, then the API will invoke the job emitter multiple times -- a second run would unblock the newly blocked jobs. Podman-based runners do this often due to a long cleanup time, and Docker-based runners (like the end-to-end test) can do it randomly depending on a race condition. https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/db037fca507178feb2bd05e0bf59df7c7534116d/routers/api/actions/runner/runner.go#L241-L244 The fix for this is to reinvoke the job emitter's logic whenever new jobs are created, so that their new blocked state can be reevaluated to see if it is correct or not. This is treated cautiously by examining if new jobs are present. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [x] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. - This will be a fix to an unreleased regression within the milestone, and so won't be user-facing. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11184 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Robert Wolffand0ko
|
70865730e6 |
fix(ui)!: remove squash merge committer trailer admin option (#11096)
fix(ui)!: Remove the instance configuration option `repository.pull-request.ADD_CO_COMMITTER_TRAILERS` (was enabled by default). It was responsible for addition of unexpected trailers to commit messages in squash merges. These trailers were `Co-authored-by: ` and `Co-committed-by: `. Both used the pull request author as value, who is also assigned as the author of the squash merge commit, which they were just repeating. Furthermore, `Co-committed-by: ` is an uncommon commit trailer, and there is only one committer for a commit. The trailers were being added by Forgejo while performing the merge, bypassing user input in the UI and weren't shown in it. See further description and more examples in [#11097](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/11097). Closes: #11097 Closes: Codeberg/Community#2030 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11096 Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de> Co-committed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de> |
||
|
Nils GorollandGusted
|
180bd488e1 |
chore: Add JWT() method for convenience and clarity (#11067)
This slightly simplifies calling code by centralizing the common 3-liner to create a JWT from claims, signed by a key. But more importantly, it reduces the risk of `key.PreProcessToken()` being forgotten, which will become relevant in upcoming PRs: `key.PreProcessToken()` adds the key id to the JWT header, which is important to efficiently validate tokens when multiple validation keys are supported (that is not the case yet) Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11067 Co-authored-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> Co-committed-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> |
||
|
GustedandBeowulf
|
7ed496ea37 |
fix: reflect allowed username change in profile setting (#11171)
- When working forgejo/forgejo!8714 I did not touch the UI to remove the note and `disabled` attribute. This was not intentional, and was likely caused by me straight going for testing (as the backend code would allow the username change). - Slightly refactor the context to a common function, don't hard error if `CanUserRename` fails but does default to that you cannot rename in that case (which is the standard behavior of OAuth2 users anyway). I already was aware that it seems !8714 wasn't working on Codeberg but someone at FOSDEM pointed it out again, thus the reason for this bug fix. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11171 Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu> Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
c7d23fa6e8 |
fix: when expanding a dynamic matrix, original 'needs' access was lost (#11164)
Fixes #11163. When expanding a dynamic matrix (or any other dynamic job), the references to the original `needs` of the jobs are lost. This is manually tested, and moderately covered by an automated test. Will follow-up with an end-to-end test after a regression run is complete. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11164 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
462ad7bb33 |
fix: don't abandon Action jobs waiting for approval (#11145)
On an open PR that is waiting for job approval, if jobs haven't been approved by the time the abandon timeout occurs they get marked as cancelled. This doesn't match the expectations of abandoned jobs in my opinion, which is that they were never able to be dispatched to a runner (no matching labels), but these jobs never got a chance. They should remain valid and blocked until approved. Discovered while testing #11125, but unrelated to the behaviour fixed there. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11145 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
283a001bb3 |
fix: cancel runs pending approval when a PR is closed (#11134)
Fixes #11125. When a PR is closed, cancel any action runs associated with the pull request that are not approved so that they do not remain in the Actions list as a blocked action. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11134 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Panagiotis "Ivory" VasilopoulosandGusted
|
81601eab85 |
feat(activitypub): use structure @PreferredUsername@host.tld:port for actors (#9254)
This modifies usernames of ActivityPub accounts to use the @example@example.tld format with an additional optional port component (e.g. @user@example.tld:42). This allows accounts from ActivityPub servers with more relaxed username requirements than those of Forgejo's to interact with Forgejo. Forgejo would also follow a "de facto" standard of ActivityPub implementations. By separating different information using @'s, we also gain future opportunities to store more information about ActivityPub accounts internally, so that we won't have to rely on e.g. the amount of dashes in a username as my migration currently does. Continuation of Aravinth's work: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4778 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9254 Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Ellen Εμιλία Άννα Zscheile <fogti@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net> Co-committed-by: Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos <git@n0toose.net> |
||
|
Antonin DelpeuchandGusted
|
12cfb4beb5 |
fix: allow test delivery for webhooks not enabled for push events (#11073)
Webhooks not enabled for push events cannot be tested using the "Test delivery" button, because the built-in test payload corresponds to a push event and is therefore filtered out at delivery time if the webhook isn't configured to trigger for such events. This fixes it by delivering the payload for a push event regardless of the webhook's configuration. This has the downside of delivering a payload which isn't necessarily representative of what the webhook will deliver for real, but it would be a significant effort to implement test payloads for all possible event types. We leave this as a follow-up improvement. Fixes #7934. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11073 Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu> Co-committed-by: Antonin Delpeuch <antonin@delpeuch.eu> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
c198082975 |
fix: empty dynamic matrix can leave action run hanging incomplete (#11063)
Fixes #11030. When a `strategy.matrix` needs to be evaluated on the output of another job, it can become evaluated into an empty set of jobs. In this case, and assuming no other jobs in the run are active, the run should reach a settled state. The logic to check the other jobs in the run and determine if this state has been hit needs to be explicitly added to the job emitter. To accomplish this change, this action run state logic was extracted out of `UpdateRunJobWithoutNotification` where it could be reused. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] This change will be noticed by a Forgejo user or admin (feature, bug fix, performance, etc.). I suggest to include a release note for this change. - [ ] This change is not visible to a Forgejo user or admin (refactor, dependency upgrade, etc.). I think there is no need to add a release note for this change. *The decision if the pull request will be shown in the release notes is up to the mergers / release team.* The content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` file will serve as the basis for the release notes. If the file does not exist, the title of the pull request will be used instead. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/11063 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
christopher-beschandGusted
|
d9545c503e |
fix: decrease watch count when blocking user (#10882)
Fixes #10881 Call the proper function for each repository the user watches, so adjusting the watch count can be done properly. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10882 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-committed-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> |
||
|
Christoph MewesandGusted
|
023a894677 |
chore: fix typos throughout the codebase (#10753)
This PR fixes a number of typos throughout the entire repository. Running https://github.com/crate-ci/typos and then changing all occurrences that I naively deemed "safe enough". Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10753 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Christoph Mewes <christoph@kubermatic.com> Co-committed-by: Christoph Mewes <christoph@kubermatic.com> |
||
|
lilyand0ko
|
66d83702a3 |
fix(i18n): remove unneeded special cases for relative time (#10691)
Followup to https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6154 en-US: two days ago -> 2 days ago two weeks ago -> 2 weeks ago two months ago -> 2 months ago two years ago -> 2 years ago Other locales still require changes to ensure that the relative time numbering is consistent. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10691 Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: lily <lesson085@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: lily <lesson085@gmail.com> |
||
|
Nils GorollandGusted
|
01fbb1499f |
fix: migrations/github: avoid getting the first issues page twice (#10798)
For the previous code with the Page attribute present in ListCursorOptions for page 1, github would not return an "After" cursor, such that the request for page 2 would request what effectively is the content of page 1 a second time. This would lead to an attempt to insert the same issues twice. Note that this is not the only reason why this can happen with the current code base. We fix this particular issue by not using the Page attribute so github does return an "After" cursor. Fixes #10794 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10798 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> Co-committed-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> |
||
|
Nils GorollandGusted
|
fb2f666535 |
fix: Wait & retry when primary rate limit are hit for Github migration (#10846)
This is a successor to #10805, which simply did not work. It is also much simpler and basically a one line change to enable an existing feature in [go-github](https://github.com/google/go-github). Fixes #10845 With this fix and #10798 in place, a migration of a repo with ~3K issues and ~1.3k pull requests finally completed successfully. ## Patch We use SleepUntilPrimaryRateLimitResetWhenRateLimited to instruct the go-github code to wait until the retry time and retry the request when the primary rate limit gets hit. ## Test case TestGitHubDownloadRepo() has been modified such that 403 rate limit errors are injected every 7 requests with a retry time of one second, resulting in the rate limit condition being hit twice with the current tests. The test case confirms that the migration code itself is in fact unaffected by the rate limit being hit. ## Scope This change does not affect secondary rate limits. If the server is restarted during the wait for the rate limit refresh, the migration likely still fails when retried, because inserts for already present database objects will be attempted. This approach effectively puts the task's goroutine to sleep until the retry time, which implies that the respective resources stay allocated. A better approach might be to add the necessary infrastructure to support restarts of migration tasks at a later time, but this is much more involved, because the migration state would need to be saved and/or re-created based on already pulled data. This would also require adding support for database upserts. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10846 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> Co-committed-by: Nils Goroll <nils.goroll@uplex.de> |
||
|
christopher-beschandGusted
|
7408bf9b1e |
chore: remove dead code in WatchIfAuto and general model documentation (#10880)
I've been reading through the watch model code and found that the `isWrite` flag is dead code — it isn't used anywhere. To be honest I don't see why we should need that anyways. Therefore, I deleted it. Also I've added some comments for the `WatchMode`. It took me quite some time to figure out why there are four options. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10880 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> Co-committed-by: christopher-besch <mail@chris-besch.com> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMichael Kriese
|
1aca323acb |
fix: make concurrency group job cancellation effect runs that are failed (#10863)
When an action's job fails, it marks the entire run as failed. Concurrency group cancellation was only looking for runs that are in a pending state, and therefore after a single job failed in the run, none of the other jobs in the run could be cancelled by a matching cancel-in-progress job. Raised in https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2315. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10863 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Mario MinardiandMathieu Fenniak
|
c84cbd56a1 |
feat: add OIDC workload identity federation support (#10481)
Add support for OIDC workload identity federation.
Add ID_TOKEN_SIGNING_ALGORITHM, ID_TOKEN_SIGNING_PRIVATE_KEY_FILE, and
ID_TOKEN_EXPIRATION_TIME settings to settings.actions to allow for admin
configuration of this functionality.
Add OIDC endpoints (/.well-known/openid-configuration and /.well-known/keys)
underneath the "/api/actions" route.
Add a token generation endpoint (/_apis/pipelines/workflows/{run_id}/idtoken)
underneath the "/api/actions" route.
Depends on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/1232
Docs PR: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1667
Signed-off-by: Mario Minardi <mminardi@shaw.ca>
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [x] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10481
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mario Minardi <mminardi@shaw.ca>
Co-committed-by: Mario Minardi <mminardi@shaw.ca>
|
||
|
zokkiandMathieu Fenniak
|
eeb47e3340 |
fix: actions variable and secret names validation (#10682)
Fixed action variables and secrets according to [Docu](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/user/actions/basic-concepts/#name-constraints): > Variable names must not start with the FORGEJO_, GITHUB_ or GITEA_ prefix. This wasn't correctly enforced, so I changed the regex ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [x] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10682 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: zokki <zokki.softwareschmiede@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: zokki <zokki.softwareschmiede@gmail.com> |
||
|
zokkiandGusted
|
5afa5a2b5a |
fix: better error message for invalid tokens (#10727)
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/7514 When a token is used, provide a better error message when that token is not valid. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10727 Reviewed-by: Ellen Εμιλία Άννα Zscheile <fogti@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: zokki <zokki.softwareschmiede@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: zokki <zokki.softwareschmiede@gmail.com> |
||
|
limiting-factorandGusted
|
a71392c6aa |
chore: update gof3/v3 v3.11.15 (#10673)
Update the Forgejo driver for gof3 with modifications for non-backward compatible changes. The changes are isolated behind the f3.Enable flag and not yet functional. The purpose of this upgrade is to not drift from the gof3 implementation while the work continues. The `fix: include remote users when counting users` commit is a functional change to Forgejo itself but does not change the behavior because the remote users are only created in fixtures or by F3. https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/59c721d26b1a01e6e6ca812b63066a33e7e5e4da/models/user/user.go#L65-L66 Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10673 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: limiting-factor <limiting-factor@posteo.com> Co-committed-by: limiting-factor <limiting-factor@posteo.com> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
0eb0179c1a |
feat: add foreign keys to the action_runner_token table (#10756)
In support of adding foreign keys to the `action_runner_token` table, this PR also had to: - Add detection and error if a table with "soft delete" is used with a foreign key, because it causes a tricky to track down foreign key violation - Remove unused xorm "soft delete" capability on the `action_runner_token` table - Change the `RepoID` and `OwnerID` fields to use the value `NULL` to indicate that this scope wasn't valid for the token, rather than the value `0` ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10756 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Michael Krieseand0ko
|
055973ce8c |
fix: correctly compute required commit status (#10747)
We need to take all matching required status into account to get the desired status because there can be some pending. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10747 Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de> Co-committed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de> |
||
|
oliverpoolandGusted
|
970b0da24d |
fix: internal server error on a large .gitmodules (#10744)
Fix #10714 (introduced in #8438) by silently ignoring large .gitmodules files. Additionally: - the limit was bumped from 10KB to 64KB (https://github.com/boostorg/boost/blob/master/.gitmodules has 20KB) - a warning is shown on the .gitmodules view page if this limit is exceeded Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10744 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr> Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr> |
||
|
Mai-LapystandMathieu Fenniak
|
ed63f06d79 |
Move web app manifest to a own cache-able route and add a setting to set "display": "standalone"; Closes #2638 (#5384)
This PR does three things: - First it moves the inline web app manifest into its own route `/manifest.json` - Secondly, it add a setting `pwa.STANDALONE` that can be set to `true` if one wants users to be allowed to "install" forgejo as an pwa into their browser. This usually means an "install app" button, which essentially just creates an shortcut to use a single-tab window for browsing the app / forgejo. - Thirdly since we have now an extra route, it checks if someone placed a `public/manifest.json` in forgejo's custom path; if yes, it's content is served instead. This allows more customization without the need on our side to completly implement every nuance of web app manifests. This closes issue #2638 ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. ### Documentation - [x] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1669) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5384): <!--number 5384 --><!--line 0 --><!--description W2FsbG93IGZvcmdlam8gdG8gcnVuIGFzIGEgcHdhIHN0YW5kYWxvbmUgYXBwbGljYXRpb24gJiBvdmVycmlkZSBvZiB0aGUgd2ViYXBwIG1hbmlmZXN0Lmpzb24gdmlhIHRoZSBhIGN1c3RvbSBmaWxlIGluIGBwdWJsaWMvbWFuaWZlc3QuanNvbmBdKGh0dHBzOi8vY29kZWJlcmcub3JnL2Zvcmdlam8vZm9yZ2Vqby9wdWxscy81Mzg0KQ==-->[allow forgejo to run as a pwa standalone application & override of the webapp manifest.json via the a custom file in `public/manifest.json`](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5384)<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5384 Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Lucas <sclu1034@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: Mai-Lapyst <mai-lapyst@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
|
GustedandMathieu Fenniak
|
6f0d6b51f1 |
fix: load reviewer for pull review dismiss action notifier
This was implicitly loaded during the mail notifications notifier. If you disable mail notifications on Forgejo then this will result in the reviewer not being loaded and NPE. |
||
|
Mathieu Fenniak
|
57766d133c | fix: don't use attachment size as max memory for ParseMultipart | ||
|
Mathieu Fenniak
|
f7442ac4c7 | fix: hide user profile anonymous options on public repo APIs | ||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
66f08baa1a |
fix: prevent intermittent test failures caused by uncancellable tasks (#10713)
Attempt to fix intermittent test failure noted in #10633, detailed technical notes in https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/10633#issuecomment-9571199. - Failure to cancel the previous processes is now a test error that aborts immediately, preventing 2hr long test runs that won't succeed. - When the process cancellation fails, the stack trace of all goroutines is printed to help diagnose the cause of any failure to cancel tasks. - `context.Background()` referenced in the actions notifier is corrected when opening git repos, which seems to be a cause of failure to cancel the tasks -- git subprocesses are spawned from the repo context, which is the background context, and that prevents the context registered in the process manager from cancelling them. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10713 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
luisadameandGusted
|
d8501b42fc |
fix: don't display pending reviews as participants (#10528)
Fixes #10155 When participants are displayed, don't include those that only have made a pending review. Those should not yet be revealed as participants. Apart from adding automated tests, this is the manual verification process I've followed: 1. Set up three users 2. User 1 creates a repository, then creates a pull request adding a new file 3. User 2 creates a new code comment but doesn't not publish the review, shows as pending. 4. User 3 creates a new code comment and publishes the review. 5. From everyone's perspective the number of participants is: 2. And, the participants displayed in the list are 1 and 3. User 2, which hasn't yet published the review is not displayed. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10528 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: luisadame <luisadame@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-committed-by: luisadame <luisadame@noreply.codeberg.org> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandGusted
|
ea421cba4e |
fix: retain Forgejo Action's commit_status entries with distinct descriptions (#10696)
In #10678, I fixed an incorrect codepath that was intended to prevent duplicate redundant entries in `commit_status`. However, the codepath that was repaired didn't take into account changes in the `description` field -- eg. going from `Waiting to run` to `Has started running` both have the `pending` commit status state but are distinct and should be retained. This PR fixes the fix so that changes in description do still cause new entries into the `commit_status` table. This issue was raised due to an end-to-end test failure in the `push-cancel` actions test. I've manually tested that this fixes the end-to-end test. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10696 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Andreas AhlenstorfandMathieu Fenniak
|
0837c8d8be |
feat: add HTTP API endpoint for runner registration (#10677)
Add an HTTP API endpoint for runner registration. It enables managing the entire runner lifecycle using Forgejo's HTTP API. See https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/forgejo-actions-feature-requests/issues/78 for background, design considerations, and usage. Example usage: ``` $ curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Accept: application/json" -H "Authorization: token 3fc3ef39805b0f811a5d7789cb7b448348d6bfbb" --data '{"name":"api-runner","description":"Lorem ipsum"}' http://localhost:3000/api/v1/user/actions/runners ``` ```json {"id":30,"uuid":"a5e33697-9f58-437d-83c3-551b6c6a6334","token":"cac45fa6726fe4e28f42598773671af28a3be121"} ``` ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10677 Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch> Co-committed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <andreas@ahlenstorf.ch> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
8f63ee9a94 |
fix: don't duplicate commit status records on workflows with empty name (#10678)
Fixes #10671. Cleanup for the inflated number of records in this table will come in a near future change. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10678 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
fa5a52b983 |
fix: simultaneously experiencing a PreExecutionError and unblocking a different job causes error blocking job emitter queue (#10665)
In a workflow such as:
```yaml
jobs:
define-matrix:
runs-on: docker
outputs:
array-value: ${{ steps.define.outputs.array }}
steps:
- id: define
run: |
echo 'array=["value 1", "value 2"]' >> "$FORGEJO_OUTPUT"
array-job:
runs-on: docker
needs: define-matrix
strategy:
matrix:
array: ${{ fromJSON(needs.define-matrix.outputs.array-value-oops-i-made-an-error-here) }}
steps: # ...
other-job:
runs-on: docker
needs: define-matrix
steps: # .... ${{ needs.define-matrix.outputs.array-value }}
```
After the job `define-matrix` is done, an error will be triggered because `array-value-oops-i-made-an-error-here` is not a valid output, and so `array-job` can't be figured out. When the job emitter triggers that error and stores it in the database, it will mark all the jobs in the workflow as failed (`FailRunPreExecutionError()`) in order to ensure that no blocked jobs remain and appear stuck forever.
However, `other-job` is also unblocked by `job_emitter.go` because it's dependency of `define-matrix` is now complete. After the error occurs, job emitter will attempt to unblock `other-job` and the conditional `UpdateRunJob` will fail because the condition `"status": StatusBlocked` is no longer true:
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/0af52cdca24dbf0d9e62a0551f6fc2d7919e68fd/services/actions/job_emitter.go#L88-L92
This causes an error, and that error rolls back the transaction in `checkJobsOfRun`, and that causes job emitter's queue to constantly retry the same work which has the same outcome each time.
This fix tells `checkJobsOfRun` that an error occurred that prevents all jobs in the run from progressing, and therefore no updates need to proceed.
Discovered while authoring https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/pulls/1367 and causing an error unintentionally. 🤣
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10665
Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
|
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
9d6ae1471e |
fix: re-running an expanded reusable workflow causes duplicate "attempt 1" job (#10666)
Placeholder tasks, which are used to store the outputs of a reusable workflow, were hard coded to always have attempt 1. If you executed "Re-run all jobs" with a reusable workflow, a second placeholder task would be created with the same attempt, which caused: (a) Forgejo to not know which attempt, and therefore which outputs, were valid, and (b) the UI to be stuck in "You are viewing an out-of-date run of this job..." when viewing the job. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10666 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
limiting-factorandGusted
|
2faaa4c5b4 |
chore: move all test blank imports in a single package (#10662)
- Create `modules/testimport/import.go` to centralize blank import needed for tests (in order to run the `init` function) to simplify maintenance. - Remove the imports that are not needed. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10662 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: limiting-factor <limiting-factor@posteo.com> Co-committed-by: limiting-factor <limiting-factor@posteo.com> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
c2649d4055 |
fix: dynamic Action jobs can stall by marking themselves blocked (#10658)
#10647 introduced a regression which was detected by the [matrix-dynamic end-to-end test](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/src/commit/0e0b1429e675b4e842fa80788d99d3112370a728/actions/example-matrix-dynamic/.forgejo/workflows/test.yml), resulting in [test failures](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/actions/runs/4608/jobs/2/attempt/1). The cause of this regression was an added code path which is invoked when a job is being reparsed due to being incomplete, in which the original `needs` value of the job is preserved. To describe it in detail, here's an incomplete job... ``` on: [push] jobs: # ... matrix-job: runs-on: docker needs: define-matrix strategy: matrix: ${{ fromJSON(needs.define-matrix.outputs.matrix-value) }} steps: # ... ``` This job is "incomplete" when it is parsed initially because the `define-matrix` job needs to be completed before its matrix can be evaluated into the correct jobs to run. It `needs: define-matrix`. When it is first parsed by Forgejo, `needs: define-matrix` is pulled out of the job definition and stored in the database, in the `action_run_job` table's `needs` column, because Forgejo will be the one managing when it is run by detecting the completion of the `define-matrix` job. During #10647, a change was made which caused new jobs' which have their own `needs` (from reusable workflows) to have their `needs` be merged with the `needs` that were stored in the database. The regression is that when a job is expanded, it will still be considered a blocked job because it has a `needs` list (even though we know that those jobs are complete): https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/commit/03e2ecfbc4301b0991ed597a03bd75511d5bf381/models/actions/run.go#L369-L370 As for why it was originally added in #10647? Unfortunately the comment that I left in the code doesn't explain the functional problem it was attempting to solve, and just describes it as-if the original needs are still needed for *something*. 🙄 It makes perfect sense to me, right now, that we would **not** keep `needs` values that are already known to be complete. I've run through my new reusable workflow end-to-end test (https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/pulls/1362) with this codepath removed and it works perfectly fine. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10658 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
75cb38faa6 |
feat: support reusable workflow expansion when with or strategy.matrix contains ${{ needs... }} (#10647)
This change allows the `with:` field of a reusable workflow to reference a previous job, such as `with: { some-input: "${{ needs.other-job.outputs.other-output }}" }`. `strategy.matrix` can also reference `${{ needs... }}`.
When a job is parsed and encounters this situation, the outer job of the workflow is marked with a field `incomplete_with` (or `incomplete_matrix`), indicating to Forgejo that it can't be executed as-is and the other jobs in its `needs` list need to be completed first. And then in `job_emitter.go` when one job is completed, it checks if other jobs had a `needs` reference to it and unblocks those jobs -- but if they're marked with `incomplete_with` then they can be sent back through the job parser, with the now-available job outputs, to be expanded into the correct definition of the job.
The core functionality for this already exists to allow `runs-on` and `strategy.matrix` to reference the outputs of other jobs, but it is expanded upon here to include `with` for reusable workflows.
There is one known defect in this implementation, but it has a limited scope -- if this code path is used to expand a nested reusable workflow, then the `${{ input.... }}` context will be incorrect. This will require an update to the jobparser in runner version 12.4.0, and so it is out-of-scope of this PR.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
- **end-to-end test:** will require the noted "known defect" to be resolved, but tests are authored at https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/compare/main...mfenniak:expand-reusable-workflows-needs
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10647
Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
|
||
|
John MoonandMathieu Fenniak
|
69f9d50745 |
feat: add Forgejo server version to runner context (#10642)
Currently, there's no way for actions runners to know what version of Forgejo is running on the server side. This makes it difficult/impossible to know which features are available and can make maintaining compatibility tricky. Let's add the Forgejo server version to the context. See associated PR in the runner repo: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/1249 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10642 Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: John Moon <john.moon@vts-i.com> Co-committed-by: John Moon <john.moon@vts-i.com> |
||
|
Valentine BrieseandMathieu Fenniak
|
51ac1bf45f |
feat: improve Discord webhook message formatting (#10626)
This pull request escapes the dash before the author when a Discord webhook is triggered by a push event and formats the commit hash as code. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). No tests were added, but the existing test for Discord webhooks passed. ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10626 Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Valentine Briese <valentinegb@icloud.com> Co-committed-by: Valentine Briese <valentinegb@icloud.com> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
9b2f7c557b |
feat: support jobs.<job_id>.secrets with reusable workflow expansion (#10627)
Follow-up to #10525; adds support for `jobs.<job_id>.secrets` to expanded reusable workflows (when no `runs-on` is specified in a job that `uses: ...` another workflow). ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). - **end-to-end testing**: [prepared, PR n](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/pulls/1351) ### Documentation - [x] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [ ] Doc to be created - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10627 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Mathieu FenniakandMathieu Fenniak
|
f7d2f51bf7 |
feat: support workflow inputs on expanded reusable workflows (#10614)
Follow-up to #10525; adds support for `on.workflow_call.inputs` to expanded reusable workflows (when no `runs-on` is specified in a job that `uses: ...` another workflow). The majority of the work for this is done by the `jobparser` library which evaluates inputs automatically when the job is being parsed and stores those inputs on the expanded jobs as the "default" value in `on.workflow_call.inputs`. Forgejo's role here is just to to ensure that `forgejo.event_name` is set to `"workflow_call"` when a job is dispatched, which causes the runner to use the inputs that are stored -- https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/src/commit/34c20aa50f1d65e1f0265b5b5274a0bbe5db128e/act/runner/expression.go#L452-L467. ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). - **end-to-end testing**: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/pulls/1323 ### Documentation - [x] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/1664 - [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Features - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10614): <!--number 10614 --><!--line 0 --><!--description c3VwcG9ydCB3b3JrZmxvdyBpbnB1dHMgb24gZXhwYW5kZWQgcmV1c2FibGUgd29ya2Zsb3dz-->support workflow inputs on expanded reusable workflows<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10614 Reviewed-by: Andreas Ahlenstorf <aahlenst@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net> |
||
|
Bram HagensandGusted
|
60fb59a7a0 |
fix: display orphan branches separately in commit graph (#10484)
Fixes #2705. Fixes #7635. This PR fixes the commit graph showing false connections for orphan/root commits. Connection lines are now shown only when a parent/child relationship exists. Visible relationships are determined using `git log`'s `%P` output by the new `ComputeGlyphConnectivity` function. The SVG template is adapted to render vertical lines conditionally. Unit tests for `ComputeGlyphConnectivity` cover regular linear commit history, orphan commits, merge commits, and non-commit glyphs (`|`, `/`, `\`). Unit tests also cover the changes to the `git log` parsing. The SVG template was verified manually. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/10484 Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Bram Hagens <bram@bramh.me> Co-committed-by: Bram Hagens <bram@bramh.me> |