Shiny NematodaandGusted 17f5ce6ce3 fix(issue-search): single exclude query was erroneosly considered as must (#12589) ...

The bleve indexer included a fast path to consider a single token to be of MUST rather than should.
However, the condition missed an additional check and would erroneosly include a NOT as a MUST.

This was not spotted by the tests as such exclude queries were usually made along with another term to avoid noise.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12589
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>

2026-05-16 09:57:51 +02:00

..

bleve

fix(issue-search): single exclude query was erroneosly considered as must (#12589)

2026-05-16 09:57:51 +02:00

db

refactor: replace Value() from Option[T] with Get() & ValueOrZeroValue() (#11218)

2026-02-10 16:41:21 +01:00

elasticsearch

refactor: replace Value() from Option[T] with Get() & ValueOrZeroValue() (#11218)

2026-02-10 16:41:21 +01:00

internal

fix(issue-search): single exclude query was erroneosly considered as must (#12589)

2026-05-16 09:57:51 +02:00

meilisearch

refactor: replace Value() from Option[T] with Get() & ValueOrZeroValue() (#11218)

2026-02-10 16:41:21 +01:00

dboptions.go

feat(issue-search): support query syntax (#9109)

2025-11-19 16:05:42 +01:00

indexer_test.go

test: attempt to fix flaky TestBleveDeleteIssue (#11686)

2026-03-16 16:48:11 +01:00

indexer.go

test: attempt to fix flaky TestBleveDeleteIssue (#11686)

2026-03-16 16:48:11 +01:00

util.go

feat: support filtering for issues with multiple assignees (#10552)

2026-02-07 22:37:33 +01:00