This avoids issue_comment events on pull requests to get that flag set and subsequently not get access to secrets.
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9003): <!--number 9003 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QWN0aW9ucyB3b3JrZmxvd3MgdHJpZ2dlcmVkIGJ5IGNvbW1lbnRzIG9yIGxhYmVscyB0byBwdWxsIHJlcXVlc3RzIG1heSBhY2Nlc3Mgc2VjcmV0cw==-->Actions workflows triggered by comments or labels to pull requests may access secrets<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9003
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: BtbN <btbn@btbn.de>
Co-committed-by: BtbN <btbn@btbn.de>
